![]() ![]() ![]() This entire layout is managed by one container, which I have used my incredible creative powers to name ' container'. It often takes less code to do the same job, and the code itself is perhaps more elegant (although that's a little subjective, I know).Ī very simple CSS grid layout, with a header, two sidebars in the content section, and footer. When it comes to larger layouts, however, you could make the case that they are easier to create in grid than they do in flexbox. However, it's possible to build more flexible layouts with grid, so that's not a hard-and-fast rule either - although it's probably fair to say that it's a little harder than with flexbox. For example, if some of your content can vary in size from page to page, CSS flexbox may well be the better option! If you are considering using a CSS framework, then you must check out our list of the best CSS frameworks.Īnd indeed, there are reasons you might prefer to use the flexibility of flexbox for page layouts, instead of the almost military strictness of grid. I mean, Bootstrap has proven that pretty convincingly. If you want to lock the position of your menu elements in place, grid would be great for that.Īnd of course, you can design huge, complex, page layouts with flexbox. It's just that with grid, the layout of the elements takes more importance than the size of the elements themselves. You can use grid to control the layout in smaller elements like menu bars. CSS Grid Vs Flexbox: Which One Is Best for Page Layouts?Īnother thing you'll hear all the time, is that you should use CSS Grid for larger areas, like the layout of a whole page, and CSS flexbox for smaller areas, say, a menu bar.Īlthough that's not a horrible rule of thumb, it's not strictly true. In the majority of use cases, both will work perfectly well. Here I simply used multiple flexboxes to mimic the three-column grid layout.Īnd this is what kinda bugs me about people insisting that grid is better than flexbox or vice versa. Great question! Glad you're paying attention. ![]() Can't You Just Use More Than One Flexbox? It can align elements to a pixel-perfect level along one dimension, but as soon as it wraps, things can go wrong. That's what people mean when they say flexbox is one-dimensional. Flexbox will take your layout, and change its shape so that it fits the desired size of your content. ![]() Grid will take your content, and change its shape so that it fits your desired layout.įlexbox puts content first. So here's the key distinction in the CSS Flexbox Vs. There will be no unexpected surprises down the line because the content will adjust to fit your grid specification. That layout, alignment and spacing will hold their shape no matter what. You'd set the boundaries of the columns, set your gap, and you're done: display : grid This just isn't a problem you'd run into with CSS grid. Therefore, the browser maintains the size of the elements when they wrap - with undesirable results. Our three-column layout wasn't explicitly defined in the code - it emerged because we sized the content in such a way as to create it. Note here, that CSS flexbox has given the content more importance than the layout. That works OK on wide screens:īut you can run into trouble if the screen isn't as wide as you hoped: You could use percentage widths, and have separate classes for the wide and thin elements. Say you wanted three columns of boxes - a wide one in the middle, and two thin ones on either side. Yes, it's a single line wrapped onto multiple rows (much like the paragraph you're reading right now), but it certainly looks two-dimensional to anyone looking at it.īut things can get dicey with more complex layouts. Unless your screen is very wide or very narrow, you're going to see a two-dimensional grid there. But elements can wrap onto new rows/columns: Is this really true? Well, I suppose technically it is, since with flexbox you have to make a choice between a row or a column with your flex-direction. Let's start with something you'll hear everywhere - CSS flexbox enables you to control layout along one dimension, while CSS Grid enables you to control layout in two dimensions. CSS Flexbox Vs Grid: Is Flexbox One Dimensional? Flexbox is setup mainly on the children.īut let's get into more details now.What are the differences between flexbox and grid? Read on to learn all you need to know about these tools (and bust a few myths along the way!). Others think flexbox takes the biscuit.īut the truth, as always. Surprisingly (to me at least), people do get a little bit tribal about this! Some people say CSS grid is the best thing since sliced bread. Flexbox! is just one of them, but think about otherĮxamples like Pepsi Vs. Have you ever noticed that whenever you have two main options in a particular area, people end up with strong opinions about which is best?ĬSS Grid Vs. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |